Along with the drive to "cure" and "treat" autism, I have seen a drive to simply medicalize behavior in children, in general. The IEP (individualized education plan) in the US is something that many parents consider a life saver, as it gives specific educational tools/interventions to kids with distinct learning needs. It is also something of a label, as a friend of mine found out, when she unsuccessfully tried to get her boy with an IEP into a Friends school (she believed it was a red flag to them.) I've read that in Finland they give the equivalent of IEPs to all students, temporarily, when needed - this seems to me a better way to go about it. And also makes me suspect that here (and I'm sure in other countries as well) it is completely intentional that children are labeled, so they can then be sold therapeutic products, tools and interventions. These are all Markets - even the children labeled "gifted" are a market.
Which begs the question, Michelle: if we're so smart, why aren't we making any money off of this?!!! Can't we sell some kind of electronic hat, or something? A scented candle?
Yes, well apparently there is a classification for 'behavior disorders' now. Check out this check-the-box diagnostic 'calculator' and tell me it's not madness:
Yes, we seem to be out of step, resisting the lure of the trough - that is heaped with the bodies of children. Chlorine dioxide enemas are the scented candles of today.
OK, so what shall we call the phenomenon that occurs in children who regress into pathological/neurodiverse behaviour following an MMR vaccine? I’m getting the vibe you don’t equate this to autism, or am I wrong here? Personally I absolutely think there should be more emphasis on identifying causes/cures and way less on awareness and I struggle to understand those who wouldn’t agree. Unless it’s people/institutions with a cover-up agenda.
Yes, there is a lot of confusion. In the case of the MMR, it was given to kids at the time when they would undergo a period of neural pruning --around 18 months. Autistic kids don't go through neural pruning so their fast growing brain bumps into the limits of the slow-growing skull -ergo the scrambling.
But for jab injured kids it would likely be encephalitis, which is a brain injury that can impair speech and socialization - a Pervasive Developmental Disorder. But not autism.
The best explanation for autism was proposed by Joseph Chilton Pearce in 1977, in his book Magical Child --which is about brain development: He notes that the failure of mother/infant bonding results in non-typical brain development. Towards the end he writes of his concerns about infants, physiologically open to bonding but removed from their mothers and placed in incubators.
This explanation makes sense of the difficulty with language particularly.
The "bonding" is a psycho-somatic fusion that is the result of the flood of oxytocin released by mother and infant after birth. Which means timing is important. In medicalized birth the child and mother may not be put together for hours after the birth in which case the window for bonding is missed. A bonded child exists enveloped in the mother's psyche as it learns to situate itself and make sense of the world.
An unbonded infant faces a world of new sensations without mediation - a state characteristic of severe autistics. How to make sense of what sensory information is important and which to ignore?
This one resonates with me. I have a somatic sensation of having been in that state of being outside of a human psychic field -something like that. Like I was alone and had to figure everything out by myself. If you read this essay by neurologist VS Ramachandran about the transmission of culture, it is like that, but the transmission through brain-state matching is not happening: https://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/ramachandran06/ramachandran06_index.html
Thanks for your reply. You have an interesting take that I haven’t come across yet. I’ll explain my personal interest - I witnessed my own son regress into what we’ve been lead to believe are typical autistic behaviours post MMR. Perfectly developed and loving toddler with speech and eye contact etc. to a head banging, non-verbal, wheel-spinning child with zero social impulse. Thankfully, after 5 months of this and me working alongside many functional practitioners (travelling to speak with the likes of Exley etc.) he began to recover and is now a healthy 4 year old. But this experience changed my life, it made me aware of the ‘autism epidemic’, which I could now see all around me (at the time I was living on a street where I later learnt all of the children had some level of autism). I’m now studying homeopathy because I believe it offers a LOT of value in improving the health and prognosis of these damaged children (more so than any other healthcare modality I’ve explored). But this is the first I’ve heard that the pathological state the jabs are causing is not actually autism but something else that’s being conflated with autism, presumably to ‘hide’ it? I mean, it makes sense to me and I’ve always been open to exploring this from all angles - the sources you provide give me yet another angle to research. Ultimately my goal is to be able to facilitate an improvement in health for the otherwise health children who experience a regression and a lot of times get stuck there long-term with zero support from mainstream medical institutions.
Would love to hear your thoughts on Wakefield and also Baron-Cohen. Wakefield I’ve always found a bit dodgy, people point to him losing his job as evidence of him being a genuine ‘truther’ yet he still manages to enjoy a lavish lifestyle (holidaying on yachts etc.). Baron-Cohen (Simon I think, it’s Ali-G’s cousin) is involved in autism and was knighted for his work in this area (alarm bells ringing…). He investigated a kind of Silicon Valley type village in mainland Europe where pretty much every child born there ended up with an autism diagnosis. He concluded it was because they all had parents who were Type-A personality types because they worked for big-tech companies. He concluded that the children’s autism pointed to an inherited/genetic factor handed down by parents who were obsessive and introverted tech-geek types. I thought the obvious slight of hand here was not acknowledging the role of non-native EMFs, which presumably children of big-tech employees living in a Silicon Valley style village would have a lot more exposure to than your average child. Non native EMFs certainly appear to be just as effective as jabs at inducing a pathological state referred to as ‘autism’ in children.
Well, I doubt that people would be so sympathetic towards Wakefield if they knew that he was backed by an elite WHO immunologist who was involved in directing policy. His name is on the Wakefield patents, which were supposed to be for a 'universal vaccine'. Wakefield's team at Royal Free were expecting to win a Nobel Prize. Hugh Fudenberg head (?) of the mysterious Neuro Immuno Therapeutics Research Foundation (NITRF). Brian Deer went to interview him in the US. Deer didn't report anything about Fudenberg's prominence and Fudenberg discredited himself and Wakefield in about two sentences - he said that he was curing autism with his own bone marrow in his kitchen and that Wakefield ideas were nonsense. https://prabook.com/web/herman_hugh.fudenberg/3399257 and he edited and contributed a chapter to this book: Biomedical scientists and public policy || Informing the public: fiscal returns of biomedical research / H. Hugh Fudenberg https://archive.org/details/biomedicalscient0000fude/mode/2up?q=funding In it he proposed the exact formulation that Suzanne Wright has, co-founder of Autism Speaks: "We wanted to drive awareness, because there was no awareness here, and awareness drives the fundraising, which in turn drives research."
And the apparent inheritability of autism can be explained with the bonding and neuronal transmission model - the infant 'tunes in' to the mother's neuronal arrangement and her neurology is installed like an operating system. If the mother was unbonded/ autistic, the child will be too. There are a lot of variations of course and probably epigenetic susceptibilities play a part. There is a chapter on autism and attachment theory in this book: https://fs3.oceanofpdf.com/OceanofPDF.com/The_Development_of_the_Unconscious_Mind_-_Allan_N_Schore.pdf?md5=bElPjMu_LPf8FAU2tJEw_w&expires=1738756527
Interesting to note that it is quite common among those working in tech to keep these devices out of the lives of their own children for as long as possible. They know how destructive it is to expose young children.
The narrative around autism has been controlled and directed. Yes, actual autism is being hidden and rebranded mostly as intellectual disability -I think that is the most common association now? Autistic regression has been documented for decades before the MMR. Adult autistics, if they were ever asked, could tell you about how much worse they were as children, including myself - I didn't speak 'til I was 5. Temple Grandin was a feces thrower. John Elder Robison was maybe not so bad, but pretty bad. Autism diagnosis has replaced Intellectual Disability diagnosis: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6683759/
OK, so your stance on all this has raised a lot of questions for me - however I think I've resolved them with the following narrative. Autism is triggered by a bonding issue, we can surmise the increased occurrence is due to societal changes (mothers being pressured into the workplace, babies being placed into childcare at increasingly lower ages etc.) that have taken place since the industrial revolution. This 'real autism' is on the increase due to the issues that create the conditions for it becoming more normalised as time goes on, plus the inter-generational (epigenetic) component at play also. The 'fake autism' induced by jabs is an intentional effort to obscure the 'real autism' and reasons for its occurrence. The other goal of the jabs is simply eugenics/depop. I see a parallel with the recent pandemic, the 'sudden deaths' I think are likely a result of the change in our electric environment brought about by the roll-out of 5G infrastructure - the virus/jabs were simply a cover-up story. I guess for an understanding of what 'real autism' is and why it happens we can look to the aforementioned societal change - in a world where familial relationships come second to industry (children in education, parents at work) there isn't as great as requirement for empathy and social bonding. In this world the human is now a cog in the machine, their role is to perform a task at the service of 'industry'. In this framework in feels like 'real autism' is a natural adaptation, albeit a forced one due to industrialisation. This directed evolution (a term used by globalists and eugenicists) is obviously a prized one otherwise there would be no effort to hide what is really at play. I mean, this all fits hand-in-glove with the trans-humanist agenda. Does any of this resonate with you?
As I understand it, it's the outcome of how we adapt to the circumstances of our birth (the birth experience is more impactful than later daycare) and more subtle than how you have formulated it. Consider that in the West, the most affluent families started having doctors (men) attend births beginning in the mid-eighteenth century. That is probably when procedures convenient to the doctors began to be imposed--like having the mother lay on her back--and so interfere with mother/infant bonding. And affluent mothers had been using wet nurses before then, even in Roman times. So, sending the kids off to boarding school was probably a natural progression. Later, poorer families in imitation of wealthier families, ( it would be a signal of status for social climbers) also began to choose medicalised births. So the unbondedness spread. Presumably, barring catastrophe, peasant births would have proceeded more naturally, especially since everyone would be familiar with birthing via farm animals.
Since autistics tend to be innovative and hyper-fixated on their area of interest, it is possible that the Industrial Revolution came about because of medicalised births. At any rate, autistic people are well adapted for a technological society being over-represented in engineering and coding professions etc. But there is a problem that the social engineers have probably been working on. This is from Unwritten Rules of Social Relationships; Decoding Social Mysteries through the Unique Perspectives of Autism by Temple Grandin and Sean Barron p. 201-202:
"What was most startling to those of us who run this social skills group
was the emotional toll just talking about the subject of honesty and lying
had taken on the AS boys.
One boy related that he had, at one time, lied about going outside to
play because he wanted to look for his cat. His face crumpled and the
colour drained from it before my eyes.
I thought perhaps the cat had been run over, but the overt uneasiness
was his reaction to having lied, as when I asked about the cat he said it
had been under the bed the whole time. The student then collapsed into
tears about the incident and lying.
Another boy related that in the first grade (remember these kids are
teenagers now) students would get stickers for reading books. He hated
to read books so he would say he read them when he had not. No
sooner did the words leave his mouth then he put his head down and
started to wail.
The group discussion quickly dissolved with the students saying they had
had enough of the topic. Another AS student insisted that lying would
never, ever be talked about in the group again."
And that brings in another problem. Since autistics are resistant to enculturation, and may not be capable of socialising, communicating effectively, being persuasive or attending meetings, plus all sorts of other quirks--like myself, I've never been able to work fulltime for longer than 2 years because I get feverish and become delirious. So. The problem is. Are autistics capable of maintaining the techno-industrial culture we've been born into? It relies on a high degree of social conformity and also the ability to be bored, follow instructions, and irrational procedures or even implement things that are just wrong. Maybe ABA/Behaviorism was meant to solve those problems?
so, autism as its understood (but pervasively misunderstood) is not what people believe it to be? It's more to do with the mother/child bond (receding, as with most social bonds) and becomes a profitable diagnosis for big pharma et al, to mask vaccine injury and conflate learning disabilities in a socioeducational climate that itself disables children from effective learning/coping strategies? something like that? am I reading this arightly?
Seems to me like the common thread is breaking the child’s bond with the mother. Perhaps where a lack of bonding happened without manipulation historically, the priesthood/social engineers notes the effects on the way the child developed and deemed this desirable. So now we have a situation where various factions and cultures have devised specific techniques to actively achieve these ends. I’m thinking vaccines, the education system, social/financial pressure on mothers being in the workplace, ritual circumcision, sexual abuse, psychological trauma via the transmission of historical/political narratives. I guess these all break that nurturing bond that children rely upon for the healthy emotional/psychological development that buffers them against state control on the mental plane.
Yes, most likely it is a kind of severe attachment disorder.
That it is profitable/useful for big pharma is the most optimistic analysis.
Worse is the proximity of MIC to the autism research and information environment.
Remember that (it used to be) ~10% of autisitics had savant abilities. If you know the story of Kevin Mitnick, for example, you'd have a sense why MIC are very concerned about autisitics.
Where we are right now, the most prominent autism NGO in the world, Autism Speaks, has funded the research and hosts a complete database of autisitic genomics. The co-founder of Autism Speaks is an ex-exec of GE, RAND and NBC. He's just launched ARPA-H ie DARPA for health.
Previous to him, the man who is most responsible for the current autism state-of-play, Bernard Rimland, was a high-level career navy research psychologist who held directorships of Personnel Measurement, Applied Psychobiology, and __Future Technologies__.
In his spare time between 1965 and 2006 we are meant to believe that he
- founded the Institute for Child Behavior Research, which became the Autism Research Institute—a member of the United Nations.
- produced a biomedcalist film that was distributed to colleges and universities.
- organized parent lobbyists through his National Society for Autistic Children
- distributed surveys suggesting a link between autism and vaccines
- created and distributed diagnostic checklists
- organised the first Autism Awareness Day in 1970
- quickly assembled “the world’s largest database of people with autism.”
- launched an academic journal
- was technical consultant for the film Rain Man
- testified in the U.S. Congress about vaccines and an emerging “autism epidemic.” - co-founded Defeat Autism Now! a hub for biomedical practitioners
- presented 1000's of times at biomedical conferences and published 100's of research papers
- wrote book chapters and encyclopedia entries.
He wrote about autism genetics, diet, nutrition, vaccines, mercury… and savantism.
So you see. Where we are now. It is not by accident.
Ah. One of my favorite things - a nice twisty rabbit hole.
As far as I've been able to find, I'm the only researcher putting these pieces together.
Alternatively, for some really great critiques of the Autism Industrial Complex, I recommend Michelle Dawson. She has a lot to say about the lack of normal ethical constraints in how autistics are treated.
I strongly relate to your sensation of being outside the human field. My mother was addicted to heroin & then went cold turkey with me still inside, so I was born still in withdrawal. She resumed her drug use, so we had no breastfeeding related oxytocin response; she told her sister that she had trouble feeling bonded to me, who observed that she was incredibly impatient with me. I wound up being trafficked along with her & was kept away from other children & the prying eyes of their parents, lest they ever change my diaper. I instinctually began overdeveloping my intellect to escape my physical reality. When I finally did encounter other children for the first time ever in kindergarten (after being rescued by my mother's family after her murder), I found them mystifyingly cruel & their labyrinthine social games utterly confusing & awful. For most of my adolescence & early adulthood I lived almost entirely in my head, dedicating a tiny portion of processing power to front for whatever necessary perfunctory tasks were needed to function IRL, while continuing whatever I'd rather be doing inside my mind. At least before puberty I could also escape through my body, as I was quite the athletic little tomboy who never met a sport in which she could not compete. But becoming a "cat house with the corners knocked off" (as my grandfather liked to put it) brought my coordination to a screeching halt, as my center of gravity moved ever higher & my balance became increasingly precarious, like a topsy turvy doll (as my grandmother liked to put it). Later on I fell in love with that womanly body & her charms, but losing the ability to run like the wind & climb to treetops like a little monkey sent me fully into my mind.
Anyway, I subbed your husband's Stack a while back (the Big Mother instead of Brother thing really resonated for me), I had no idea you were on here as well! I had never opened up over there about exactly what's "wrong with me," but your comment on that isolated somatic experience surfaced it for me in a very natural way that made it much easier.
I generally just do articles, podcasts & comments sections on Substack but not the social media stuff they added more recently. I had never been to this part of the Stack before, probably because it always seems like the social engagement on any social media platform generally sucks. I think Jasun has the right idea about using the tech to facilitate something face to face for people. I'm still not great with social cues, but only having black words on a white screen just leaves me to fill in the blanks with my own anxious insecurities.
Thank you for sharing your story. It is an important testimony to the dark heart of our culture that child abuse--even the severe abuse that you were subjected to--is endemic. It really is.
Jasun and I both come from pro-socialist/Progressive families where pedophilia was considered normal and not at all harmful. Margaret Mead popularised the idea that it was only the social stigma that scarred the sexually abused child and that is what my mother believed and often touted. It is a common belief among Progressives, as maybe has become obvious?
But our family life was mostly stable and sober and that makes up for a lot. You probably know the ACE study?
Funnily enough I just found out the name of the therapy I did that really helped me come in to myself. It was after that program that I began to speak It's called Milieu Therapy, pioneered by Bruno Bettelheim. I've been dismissing him as a fraud for years, which, I guess is the point. Judge Rotenberg Center gets a thumbs-up but Bettelheim is a pariah.
About onlinity, I was lucky enough to find the Rigorous Intuition conspiracy forum in 2005-ish. In those early days, the founder Jeff Wells was writing about elite pedophile rings and child trafficking so a number of Survivors found there way there. It was the only place like that. There is a wealth of testimony and research archived there. That's where I was educated, you might say. Unfortunately it was taken over by a clique of cancel-culture Lefties and now it is very quiet.
At any rate, I don't discount online encounters like J does. For some Auties, it is too overwhelming just to be in the same room with another person to communicate effectively. I was often like that. Or I'd just get stuck in masking and superficial interaction. People can connect meaningfully over the internet. Jasun and I certainly did.
But I always keep in mind that a large percentage of what we see of "other people" online are agents and influencers. Back in, what? 2012? I read that the CCP had 20k operatives running social media ops. A little later I learned of the persona management software that allows an agent to run many fake accounts on social media. Scientologists as well are at it. In comment sections too.
Once you "get" that that is what is going on, you can "read" the intent of the influence operations that are running. Often times it's just divide, divide, divide.
I came across this, and it made me think of what you wrote yesterday. I think this gender medicine complex (which is itself a branch of the very medical industrial complex of which you write) is fruit of the same tree as the ideas your parents accepted about pedophilic harm coming only from cultural social encoding. I can only imagine their beliefs on those matters left you in harm's way & did some damage to your psyche; I would say that I am solid evidence that the premise is simply not true. I will certainly look into the the therapeutic techniques you mentioned. I can understand social dynamics in theory, but just can't seem to navigate them in practice.
We have a once-close friend, to whom I sent this other article, because I don't think I can live with not at least trying. I can remember when she told me about her daughter having officially become a teenager at 13 and disappearing behind her bedroom door; she even said something about how she had no idea what her daughter was doing in there all day long, other than that she was always online. The next time we talked to her (actually talked by speakerphone), she told us her now 14 year old daughter recently identified as a boy. My husband was just instantly pissed because she carelessly married & got pregnant by a dude who was clear that he didn't want kids (he promptly left after telling that directly to the daughter) & then she stayed too busy eating pills & watching soapy dramas with her friends to actually pay attention to her KID!!! It was all he could do to not just start cussing in that moment, but he managed to just say, "Oh!" She did express some concern over the idea that her daughter (she was still saying "daughter," it was very recent) could possibly make such a life-altering decision at the tender age of 14. But then she ranted about how glad she was to have moved in with family in Oakland (California) because her trans daughter's life is endangered by the Governor's bigoted new laws against exposing young children to pornographic material in schools & prohibiting "gender affirming" drugs or surgeries for minors. We tried to gently caution her to be careful, but I suppose our shock & disapproval still shone through. I've still reached out to her from time to time, but I haven't heard back from her in almost two years; last year I heard from a mutual friend still on Facebook that her daughter got a boy's haircut & name & was talking about wanting to medicalize. I don't know how to help someone like that, but I feel like it's too important to not keep trying.
Yes, autisitcs are over-represented in the trans-identified.
Not coincidentally, I'm sure, Mark and David Geier pioneered the use of Lupron, a sterilizing drug now used as a puberty blocker, on autistic kids. The Geiers operated multiple clinics in the US as well as labs for genetic and other testing. Mark was an expert witness in vaccine injury cases. That went on for nearly 20 years. May still be going on? There is so much secrecy. Mark Geier is still an accredited geneticist:
Quote: "Geier worked at the Laboratory of General and Comparative Biochemistry, National Institutes of Health in the 1970s and 1980s as a student researcher (1969–1970), research geneticist (1971–1973), staff fellow (1973–1974), on the professional staff (1974–1978), and as a guest worker (1980–1982). ... He is a Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics. ... he operates several organizations from his private address in Maryland, including the Institute for Chronic Illness and the Genetic Centers of America."
One of the clever/powerful manipulations of the trans-engineers is to always fabricate a psuedo reality of threat and rejection. This activates the fight or flight mechanism of the brain, which is old _prehuman_ and non-rational.
If your friend and her daughter can be made to feel safe, they will be more open to "hearing" your concerns. That is a big if. And an explanation for the calls for affirmation and "safe spaces."
But the fog is clearing. There is a good chance that your friend's daughter will find her way out. My niece did. She really wanted to be a boy, and then she didn't. So there is hope.
Along with the drive to "cure" and "treat" autism, I have seen a drive to simply medicalize behavior in children, in general. The IEP (individualized education plan) in the US is something that many parents consider a life saver, as it gives specific educational tools/interventions to kids with distinct learning needs. It is also something of a label, as a friend of mine found out, when she unsuccessfully tried to get her boy with an IEP into a Friends school (she believed it was a red flag to them.) I've read that in Finland they give the equivalent of IEPs to all students, temporarily, when needed - this seems to me a better way to go about it. And also makes me suspect that here (and I'm sure in other countries as well) it is completely intentional that children are labeled, so they can then be sold therapeutic products, tools and interventions. These are all Markets - even the children labeled "gifted" are a market.
Which begs the question, Michelle: if we're so smart, why aren't we making any money off of this?!!! Can't we sell some kind of electronic hat, or something? A scented candle?
Yes, well apparently there is a classification for 'behavior disorders' now. Check out this check-the-box diagnostic 'calculator' and tell me it's not madness:
Social (Pragmatic) Communication Disorder (SCD) https://www.pediatriconcall.com/calculators/dsm-5-social-communication-disorder
Conduct Disorder (Conduct Disorder!!!)
https://www.pediatriconcall.com/calculators/dsm-5-conduct-disorder
Yes, we seem to be out of step, resisting the lure of the trough - that is heaped with the bodies of children. Chlorine dioxide enemas are the scented candles of today.
OK, so what shall we call the phenomenon that occurs in children who regress into pathological/neurodiverse behaviour following an MMR vaccine? I’m getting the vibe you don’t equate this to autism, or am I wrong here? Personally I absolutely think there should be more emphasis on identifying causes/cures and way less on awareness and I struggle to understand those who wouldn’t agree. Unless it’s people/institutions with a cover-up agenda.
Yes, there is a lot of confusion. In the case of the MMR, it was given to kids at the time when they would undergo a period of neural pruning --around 18 months. Autistic kids don't go through neural pruning so their fast growing brain bumps into the limits of the slow-growing skull -ergo the scrambling.
But for jab injured kids it would likely be encephalitis, which is a brain injury that can impair speech and socialization - a Pervasive Developmental Disorder. But not autism.
The best explanation for autism was proposed by Joseph Chilton Pearce in 1977, in his book Magical Child --which is about brain development: He notes that the failure of mother/infant bonding results in non-typical brain development. Towards the end he writes of his concerns about infants, physiologically open to bonding but removed from their mothers and placed in incubators.
This explanation makes sense of the difficulty with language particularly.
The "bonding" is a psycho-somatic fusion that is the result of the flood of oxytocin released by mother and infant after birth. Which means timing is important. In medicalized birth the child and mother may not be put together for hours after the birth in which case the window for bonding is missed. A bonded child exists enveloped in the mother's psyche as it learns to situate itself and make sense of the world.
An unbonded infant faces a world of new sensations without mediation - a state characteristic of severe autistics. How to make sense of what sensory information is important and which to ignore?
This one resonates with me. I have a somatic sensation of having been in that state of being outside of a human psychic field -something like that. Like I was alone and had to figure everything out by myself. If you read this essay by neurologist VS Ramachandran about the transmission of culture, it is like that, but the transmission through brain-state matching is not happening: https://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/ramachandran06/ramachandran06_index.html
New research is approaching this understanding now: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6396994_Intentional_Attunement_Mirror_Neurons_and_the_Neural_Underpinnings_of_Interpersonal_Relations
Thanks for your reply. You have an interesting take that I haven’t come across yet. I’ll explain my personal interest - I witnessed my own son regress into what we’ve been lead to believe are typical autistic behaviours post MMR. Perfectly developed and loving toddler with speech and eye contact etc. to a head banging, non-verbal, wheel-spinning child with zero social impulse. Thankfully, after 5 months of this and me working alongside many functional practitioners (travelling to speak with the likes of Exley etc.) he began to recover and is now a healthy 4 year old. But this experience changed my life, it made me aware of the ‘autism epidemic’, which I could now see all around me (at the time I was living on a street where I later learnt all of the children had some level of autism). I’m now studying homeopathy because I believe it offers a LOT of value in improving the health and prognosis of these damaged children (more so than any other healthcare modality I’ve explored). But this is the first I’ve heard that the pathological state the jabs are causing is not actually autism but something else that’s being conflated with autism, presumably to ‘hide’ it? I mean, it makes sense to me and I’ve always been open to exploring this from all angles - the sources you provide give me yet another angle to research. Ultimately my goal is to be able to facilitate an improvement in health for the otherwise health children who experience a regression and a lot of times get stuck there long-term with zero support from mainstream medical institutions.
Would love to hear your thoughts on Wakefield and also Baron-Cohen. Wakefield I’ve always found a bit dodgy, people point to him losing his job as evidence of him being a genuine ‘truther’ yet he still manages to enjoy a lavish lifestyle (holidaying on yachts etc.). Baron-Cohen (Simon I think, it’s Ali-G’s cousin) is involved in autism and was knighted for his work in this area (alarm bells ringing…). He investigated a kind of Silicon Valley type village in mainland Europe where pretty much every child born there ended up with an autism diagnosis. He concluded it was because they all had parents who were Type-A personality types because they worked for big-tech companies. He concluded that the children’s autism pointed to an inherited/genetic factor handed down by parents who were obsessive and introverted tech-geek types. I thought the obvious slight of hand here was not acknowledging the role of non-native EMFs, which presumably children of big-tech employees living in a Silicon Valley style village would have a lot more exposure to than your average child. Non native EMFs certainly appear to be just as effective as jabs at inducing a pathological state referred to as ‘autism’ in children.
Well, I doubt that people would be so sympathetic towards Wakefield if they knew that he was backed by an elite WHO immunologist who was involved in directing policy. His name is on the Wakefield patents, which were supposed to be for a 'universal vaccine'. Wakefield's team at Royal Free were expecting to win a Nobel Prize. Hugh Fudenberg head (?) of the mysterious Neuro Immuno Therapeutics Research Foundation (NITRF). Brian Deer went to interview him in the US. Deer didn't report anything about Fudenberg's prominence and Fudenberg discredited himself and Wakefield in about two sentences - he said that he was curing autism with his own bone marrow in his kitchen and that Wakefield ideas were nonsense. https://prabook.com/web/herman_hugh.fudenberg/3399257 and he edited and contributed a chapter to this book: Biomedical scientists and public policy || Informing the public: fiscal returns of biomedical research / H. Hugh Fudenberg https://archive.org/details/biomedicalscient0000fude/mode/2up?q=funding In it he proposed the exact formulation that Suzanne Wright has, co-founder of Autism Speaks: "We wanted to drive awareness, because there was no awareness here, and awareness drives the fundraising, which in turn drives research."
And the apparent inheritability of autism can be explained with the bonding and neuronal transmission model - the infant 'tunes in' to the mother's neuronal arrangement and her neurology is installed like an operating system. If the mother was unbonded/ autistic, the child will be too. There are a lot of variations of course and probably epigenetic susceptibilities play a part. There is a chapter on autism and attachment theory in this book: https://fs3.oceanofpdf.com/OceanofPDF.com/The_Development_of_the_Unconscious_Mind_-_Allan_N_Schore.pdf?md5=bElPjMu_LPf8FAU2tJEw_w&expires=1738756527
Interesting to note that it is quite common among those working in tech to keep these devices out of the lives of their own children for as long as possible. They know how destructive it is to expose young children.
The narrative around autism has been controlled and directed. Yes, actual autism is being hidden and rebranded mostly as intellectual disability -I think that is the most common association now? Autistic regression has been documented for decades before the MMR. Adult autistics, if they were ever asked, could tell you about how much worse they were as children, including myself - I didn't speak 'til I was 5. Temple Grandin was a feces thrower. John Elder Robison was maybe not so bad, but pretty bad. Autism diagnosis has replaced Intellectual Disability diagnosis: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6683759/
OK, so your stance on all this has raised a lot of questions for me - however I think I've resolved them with the following narrative. Autism is triggered by a bonding issue, we can surmise the increased occurrence is due to societal changes (mothers being pressured into the workplace, babies being placed into childcare at increasingly lower ages etc.) that have taken place since the industrial revolution. This 'real autism' is on the increase due to the issues that create the conditions for it becoming more normalised as time goes on, plus the inter-generational (epigenetic) component at play also. The 'fake autism' induced by jabs is an intentional effort to obscure the 'real autism' and reasons for its occurrence. The other goal of the jabs is simply eugenics/depop. I see a parallel with the recent pandemic, the 'sudden deaths' I think are likely a result of the change in our electric environment brought about by the roll-out of 5G infrastructure - the virus/jabs were simply a cover-up story. I guess for an understanding of what 'real autism' is and why it happens we can look to the aforementioned societal change - in a world where familial relationships come second to industry (children in education, parents at work) there isn't as great as requirement for empathy and social bonding. In this world the human is now a cog in the machine, their role is to perform a task at the service of 'industry'. In this framework in feels like 'real autism' is a natural adaptation, albeit a forced one due to industrialisation. This directed evolution (a term used by globalists and eugenicists) is obviously a prized one otherwise there would be no effort to hide what is really at play. I mean, this all fits hand-in-glove with the trans-humanist agenda. Does any of this resonate with you?
As I understand it, it's the outcome of how we adapt to the circumstances of our birth (the birth experience is more impactful than later daycare) and more subtle than how you have formulated it. Consider that in the West, the most affluent families started having doctors (men) attend births beginning in the mid-eighteenth century. That is probably when procedures convenient to the doctors began to be imposed--like having the mother lay on her back--and so interfere with mother/infant bonding. And affluent mothers had been using wet nurses before then, even in Roman times. So, sending the kids off to boarding school was probably a natural progression. Later, poorer families in imitation of wealthier families, ( it would be a signal of status for social climbers) also began to choose medicalised births. So the unbondedness spread. Presumably, barring catastrophe, peasant births would have proceeded more naturally, especially since everyone would be familiar with birthing via farm animals.
Since autistics tend to be innovative and hyper-fixated on their area of interest, it is possible that the Industrial Revolution came about because of medicalised births. At any rate, autistic people are well adapted for a technological society being over-represented in engineering and coding professions etc. But there is a problem that the social engineers have probably been working on. This is from Unwritten Rules of Social Relationships; Decoding Social Mysteries through the Unique Perspectives of Autism by Temple Grandin and Sean Barron p. 201-202:
"What was most startling to those of us who run this social skills group
was the emotional toll just talking about the subject of honesty and lying
had taken on the AS boys.
One boy related that he had, at one time, lied about going outside to
play because he wanted to look for his cat. His face crumpled and the
colour drained from it before my eyes.
I thought perhaps the cat had been run over, but the overt uneasiness
was his reaction to having lied, as when I asked about the cat he said it
had been under the bed the whole time. The student then collapsed into
tears about the incident and lying.
Another boy related that in the first grade (remember these kids are
teenagers now) students would get stickers for reading books. He hated
to read books so he would say he read them when he had not. No
sooner did the words leave his mouth then he put his head down and
started to wail.
The group discussion quickly dissolved with the students saying they had
had enough of the topic. Another AS student insisted that lying would
never, ever be talked about in the group again."
And that brings in another problem. Since autistics are resistant to enculturation, and may not be capable of socialising, communicating effectively, being persuasive or attending meetings, plus all sorts of other quirks--like myself, I've never been able to work fulltime for longer than 2 years because I get feverish and become delirious. So. The problem is. Are autistics capable of maintaining the techno-industrial culture we've been born into? It relies on a high degree of social conformity and also the ability to be bored, follow instructions, and irrational procedures or even implement things that are just wrong. Maybe ABA/Behaviorism was meant to solve those problems?
so, autism as its understood (but pervasively misunderstood) is not what people believe it to be? It's more to do with the mother/child bond (receding, as with most social bonds) and becomes a profitable diagnosis for big pharma et al, to mask vaccine injury and conflate learning disabilities in a socioeducational climate that itself disables children from effective learning/coping strategies? something like that? am I reading this arightly?
Seems to me like the common thread is breaking the child’s bond with the mother. Perhaps where a lack of bonding happened without manipulation historically, the priesthood/social engineers notes the effects on the way the child developed and deemed this desirable. So now we have a situation where various factions and cultures have devised specific techniques to actively achieve these ends. I’m thinking vaccines, the education system, social/financial pressure on mothers being in the workplace, ritual circumcision, sexual abuse, psychological trauma via the transmission of historical/political narratives. I guess these all break that nurturing bond that children rely upon for the healthy emotional/psychological development that buffers them against state control on the mental plane.
VS Ramachandran wrote about the transmission of culture through the mother/infant bond. A stable society will have strong mother/infant bonds.
We are in a revolutionary "Progressive" culture and have been for ... centuries?
The monastic/ feudal system was stable and lasted for 400 years. Maybe since the Black Death then?
Yes, most likely it is a kind of severe attachment disorder.
That it is profitable/useful for big pharma is the most optimistic analysis.
Worse is the proximity of MIC to the autism research and information environment.
Remember that (it used to be) ~10% of autisitics had savant abilities. If you know the story of Kevin Mitnick, for example, you'd have a sense why MIC are very concerned about autisitics.
Where we are right now, the most prominent autism NGO in the world, Autism Speaks, has funded the research and hosts a complete database of autisitic genomics. The co-founder of Autism Speaks is an ex-exec of GE, RAND and NBC. He's just launched ARPA-H ie DARPA for health.
Previous to him, the man who is most responsible for the current autism state-of-play, Bernard Rimland, was a high-level career navy research psychologist who held directorships of Personnel Measurement, Applied Psychobiology, and __Future Technologies__.
In his spare time between 1965 and 2006 we are meant to believe that he
- founded the Institute for Child Behavior Research, which became the Autism Research Institute—a member of the United Nations.
- produced a biomedcalist film that was distributed to colleges and universities.
- organized parent lobbyists through his National Society for Autistic Children
- distributed surveys suggesting a link between autism and vaccines
- created and distributed diagnostic checklists
- organised the first Autism Awareness Day in 1970
- quickly assembled “the world’s largest database of people with autism.”
- launched an academic journal
- was technical consultant for the film Rain Man
- testified in the U.S. Congress about vaccines and an emerging “autism epidemic.” - co-founded Defeat Autism Now! a hub for biomedical practitioners
- presented 1000's of times at biomedical conferences and published 100's of research papers
- wrote book chapters and encyclopedia entries.
He wrote about autism genetics, diet, nutrition, vaccines, mercury… and savantism.
So you see. Where we are now. It is not by accident.
aw, shit, mrs. horsley. you've really sent me down a rabbit hole, now, thanks... i'll report back soon, if i find daylight....
Ah. One of my favorite things - a nice twisty rabbit hole.
As far as I've been able to find, I'm the only researcher putting these pieces together.
Alternatively, for some really great critiques of the Autism Industrial Complex, I recommend Michelle Dawson. She has a lot to say about the lack of normal ethical constraints in how autistics are treated.
She used to blog but now is reviewing the scientific literature--if you skew that way? She has an archive of essays here: https://www.sentex.net/%7Enexus23/naa_03.html
https://x.com/autismcrisis/status/1893596193780863268
https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2018/08/conversation-michelle-dawson-2.html
I strongly relate to your sensation of being outside the human field. My mother was addicted to heroin & then went cold turkey with me still inside, so I was born still in withdrawal. She resumed her drug use, so we had no breastfeeding related oxytocin response; she told her sister that she had trouble feeling bonded to me, who observed that she was incredibly impatient with me. I wound up being trafficked along with her & was kept away from other children & the prying eyes of their parents, lest they ever change my diaper. I instinctually began overdeveloping my intellect to escape my physical reality. When I finally did encounter other children for the first time ever in kindergarten (after being rescued by my mother's family after her murder), I found them mystifyingly cruel & their labyrinthine social games utterly confusing & awful. For most of my adolescence & early adulthood I lived almost entirely in my head, dedicating a tiny portion of processing power to front for whatever necessary perfunctory tasks were needed to function IRL, while continuing whatever I'd rather be doing inside my mind. At least before puberty I could also escape through my body, as I was quite the athletic little tomboy who never met a sport in which she could not compete. But becoming a "cat house with the corners knocked off" (as my grandfather liked to put it) brought my coordination to a screeching halt, as my center of gravity moved ever higher & my balance became increasingly precarious, like a topsy turvy doll (as my grandmother liked to put it). Later on I fell in love with that womanly body & her charms, but losing the ability to run like the wind & climb to treetops like a little monkey sent me fully into my mind.
Anyway, I subbed your husband's Stack a while back (the Big Mother instead of Brother thing really resonated for me), I had no idea you were on here as well! I had never opened up over there about exactly what's "wrong with me," but your comment on that isolated somatic experience surfaced it for me in a very natural way that made it much easier.
I generally just do articles, podcasts & comments sections on Substack but not the social media stuff they added more recently. I had never been to this part of the Stack before, probably because it always seems like the social engagement on any social media platform generally sucks. I think Jasun has the right idea about using the tech to facilitate something face to face for people. I'm still not great with social cues, but only having black words on a white screen just leaves me to fill in the blanks with my own anxious insecurities.
Welcome Magdalene!
Thank you for sharing your story. It is an important testimony to the dark heart of our culture that child abuse--even the severe abuse that you were subjected to--is endemic. It really is.
Jasun and I both come from pro-socialist/Progressive families where pedophilia was considered normal and not at all harmful. Margaret Mead popularised the idea that it was only the social stigma that scarred the sexually abused child and that is what my mother believed and often touted. It is a common belief among Progressives, as maybe has become obvious?
But our family life was mostly stable and sober and that makes up for a lot. You probably know the ACE study?
Funnily enough I just found out the name of the therapy I did that really helped me come in to myself. It was after that program that I began to speak It's called Milieu Therapy, pioneered by Bruno Bettelheim. I've been dismissing him as a fraud for years, which, I guess is the point. Judge Rotenberg Center gets a thumbs-up but Bettelheim is a pariah.
About onlinity, I was lucky enough to find the Rigorous Intuition conspiracy forum in 2005-ish. In those early days, the founder Jeff Wells was writing about elite pedophile rings and child trafficking so a number of Survivors found there way there. It was the only place like that. There is a wealth of testimony and research archived there. That's where I was educated, you might say. Unfortunately it was taken over by a clique of cancel-culture Lefties and now it is very quiet.
At any rate, I don't discount online encounters like J does. For some Auties, it is too overwhelming just to be in the same room with another person to communicate effectively. I was often like that. Or I'd just get stuck in masking and superficial interaction. People can connect meaningfully over the internet. Jasun and I certainly did.
But I always keep in mind that a large percentage of what we see of "other people" online are agents and influencers. Back in, what? 2012? I read that the CCP had 20k operatives running social media ops. A little later I learned of the persona management software that allows an agent to run many fake accounts on social media. Scientologists as well are at it. In comment sections too.
Once you "get" that that is what is going on, you can "read" the intent of the influence operations that are running. Often times it's just divide, divide, divide.
Anyway, welcome aboard!
I came across this, and it made me think of what you wrote yesterday. I think this gender medicine complex (which is itself a branch of the very medical industrial complex of which you write) is fruit of the same tree as the ideas your parents accepted about pedophilic harm coming only from cultural social encoding. I can only imagine their beliefs on those matters left you in harm's way & did some damage to your psyche; I would say that I am solid evidence that the premise is simply not true. I will certainly look into the the therapeutic techniques you mentioned. I can understand social dynamics in theory, but just can't seem to navigate them in practice.
https://open.substack.com/pub/margox/p/breast-offerings?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1dvul1
We have a once-close friend, to whom I sent this other article, because I don't think I can live with not at least trying. I can remember when she told me about her daughter having officially become a teenager at 13 and disappearing behind her bedroom door; she even said something about how she had no idea what her daughter was doing in there all day long, other than that she was always online. The next time we talked to her (actually talked by speakerphone), she told us her now 14 year old daughter recently identified as a boy. My husband was just instantly pissed because she carelessly married & got pregnant by a dude who was clear that he didn't want kids (he promptly left after telling that directly to the daughter) & then she stayed too busy eating pills & watching soapy dramas with her friends to actually pay attention to her KID!!! It was all he could do to not just start cussing in that moment, but he managed to just say, "Oh!" She did express some concern over the idea that her daughter (she was still saying "daughter," it was very recent) could possibly make such a life-altering decision at the tender age of 14. But then she ranted about how glad she was to have moved in with family in Oakland (California) because her trans daughter's life is endangered by the Governor's bigoted new laws against exposing young children to pornographic material in schools & prohibiting "gender affirming" drugs or surgeries for minors. We tried to gently caution her to be careful, but I suppose our shock & disapproval still shone through. I've still reached out to her from time to time, but I haven't heard back from her in almost two years; last year I heard from a mutual friend still on Facebook that her daughter got a boy's haircut & name & was talking about wanting to medicalize. I don't know how to help someone like that, but I feel like it's too important to not keep trying.
https://open.substack.com/pub/jbilek/p/the-gender-industry-deconstructing?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1dvul1
Yes, autisitcs are over-represented in the trans-identified.
Not coincidentally, I'm sure, Mark and David Geier pioneered the use of Lupron, a sterilizing drug now used as a puberty blocker, on autistic kids. The Geiers operated multiple clinics in the US as well as labs for genetic and other testing. Mark was an expert witness in vaccine injury cases. That went on for nearly 20 years. May still be going on? There is so much secrecy. Mark Geier is still an accredited geneticist:
Quote: "Geier worked at the Laboratory of General and Comparative Biochemistry, National Institutes of Health in the 1970s and 1980s as a student researcher (1969–1970), research geneticist (1971–1973), staff fellow (1973–1974), on the professional staff (1974–1978), and as a guest worker (1980–1982). ... He is a Fellow of the American College of Medical Genetics. ... he operates several organizations from his private address in Maryland, including the Institute for Chronic Illness and the Genetic Centers of America."
One of the clever/powerful manipulations of the trans-engineers is to always fabricate a psuedo reality of threat and rejection. This activates the fight or flight mechanism of the brain, which is old _prehuman_ and non-rational.
If your friend and her daughter can be made to feel safe, they will be more open to "hearing" your concerns. That is a big if. And an explanation for the calls for affirmation and "safe spaces."
But the fog is clearing. There is a good chance that your friend's daughter will find her way out. My niece did. She really wanted to be a boy, and then she didn't. So there is hope.